NCEA Level 1Interpreting displaysAS 91946

Interpreting box plots and scatter plots in the 91946 exam

What this lesson covers

  • A claim about two groups needs evidence from the whole distribution, not from single values.
  • A relationship shown in a display supports a claim only as far as its direction and strength go.
Key idea

Three things the exam asks you to do

  • Identify: read the right information.
  • Relate: link your findings to the evidence.
  • Critically engage: how good is it?
TaskMeans
Identifyread the right values
Relatelink findings to the evidence
Critically engagequality, limits, other views
Key idea

The resource, and its claim

  • A news article makes a claim.
  • Two displays come with it.
  • Does the evidence support the claim?
In the resource
Headline"Driven students get to school faster"
Source 1box plots: trip time, bus and car
Source 2scatter: distance and trip time
Sample30 bus and 30 car students, one school
Worked example

Source 1: the box plots

  • Trip times for 30 bus and 30 car students.
  • Same scale, so they can be compared.
  • The car box sits only slightly lower.
Source 1: the box plots
Worked example

Identify: read the values

  • Medians: 18 minutes by bus, 15 by car.
  • The middle halves are the same width.
  • Give every value with its units.
BusCar
Median18 min15 min
Middle 50%12 to 2410 to 22
IQR12 min12 min
Range6 to 404 to 38
Worked example

Relate: does it support the claim?

  • Each median sits inside the other's box.
  • So no call can be made.
  • The claim is not supported by this sample.
CheckResult
Car median, 15inside the bus box, 12 to 24
Bus median, 18inside the car box, 10 to 22
Sono call can be made
Claimnot supported by this sample
Key idea

Do not use one value

  • "The fastest trip was by car, 4 minutes."
  • That is one student, not a tendency.
  • The examiner lists this as a Not Achieved habit.
Worked example

Source 2: the scatter plot

  • Distance from school against trip time.
  • Twenty students, one dot each.
  • A clear upward pattern.
Source 2: the scatter plot
Worked example

Describe the relationship

  • Positive, and strong.
  • About 2 more minutes for each kilometre.
  • Distance seems to matter a lot.
FeatureIn context
Directionpositive: further takes longer
Strengthstrong: close to a line
Rateabout 2 minutes a kilometre
Sodistance matters more than mode
Key idea

Put the two sources together

  • Mode made little clear difference.
  • Distance made a big one.
  • So the article may be looking at the wrong variable.
Key idea

Critically engage

  • One school, 60 students: a small sample.
  • Were car students living closer?
  • What does the article leave out?
Key idea

Bringing in your own view

  • Some questions ask for a personal worldview.
  • Your values: cost, environment, independence.
  • Stated as yours, alongside the evidence.
Worked example

A justified recommendation

  • Evidence from both sources.
  • Your view, clearly labelled.
  • A recommendation that follows from both.
Evidence 1medians only 3 min apart, no call
Evidence 2distance strongly linked to time
Worldviewbus: cheaper, fewer cars at the gate
Sofor most, the bus costs little time
Summary

What to take away

  • Identify, relate, engage, then recommend.
Identifymedians, boxes, values, units
Test a claimagainst the whole distribution
No callmedians inside each other's box
Scatterdirection, strength, rate
Two sourcesuse both to justify
Worldviewyour values, stated as yours
Avoidsingle values and "proves"
Your turn

Your turn: four questions

  • A claim about gamers' reaction times.
  • Pause here and answer each one.
  • Lower reaction time means faster.
Question
DataReaction time (ms). Gamers: median 250, box 220 to 270. Others: median 290, box 260 to 320.
1By how much do the medians differ?
2Can you make a call? Explain with values.
3Rewrite the claim "Gamers react faster" so it is justified.
4A weak negative scatter of gaming hours and time. Proof? Why?
Show answer

1. 290 − 250 = 40 ms. 2. Yes. The gamers' median, 250 ms, is below the others' box, which starts at 260, so gamers in this population tend to have faster (lower) reaction times. 3. For example: "In this sample, gamers tend to have faster reaction times than non-gamers, with a median of 250 ms compared with 290 ms." 4. No. A weak relationship means hours explain little of the variation, and an association does not show cause: age or sleep could affect both.

Worked example

The answers

  • 290 − 250 = 40 ms.
  • Yes: 250 is below the other box, which starts at 260.
  • "In this sample, gamers tend to react faster..."
  • No: weak, and association is not cause.

Is your child on track?

Take the free placement test